The Australian Greens are implementing a high-risk strategy in a bid to win their first ever House of Representatives seat in a general election. Campaign material released by the Greens this week establishes the Federal seat of Melbourne as the setting of a historical campaign: “If just one in ten [voters] change their vote to Green,” says candidate Adam Bandt, “then we will make history.”
The Greens’ Adam Bandt faces stiff competition from incumbent Lindsay Tanner. Labor will invest all the resources at its disposal to protect the Government’s competent Finance Minister. The loss of a high-profile figure like Tanner would be a severe blow for the Rudd Government, and Labor simply won’t let this happen. We can expect them to substantially outspend the Greens, bombard residents with pamphlets, and use the powers of government to their benefit.
Presenting the 2010 election campaign as “historical” has some advantages for the Greens. It communicates a sense of inevitability that will raise the morale of grassroots supporters and existing Greens voters, while increasing the appeal to new left-leaning voters. This was the successful approach taken by former Labor leader Gough Whitlam in his “it’s time” campaign to become the first Labor prime minister in over two decades. More recently, the strategy helped elect Barack Obama to the Oval Office. While the Obama camp somewhat played down the historical nature of his candidacy and potential to become the first African American president, the media did not. The sense of being a part of history was communicated by the media and no doubt helped his campaign.
For all its positives, the Greens’ strategy poses a serious risk. If the Greens fail to win what they have presented as an almost unlosable election, they risk damaging their attractiveness in the future. A loss will also strengthen their opponent who could rightly be perceived as exceeding expectations in the eyes of the electorate. A Labor win will be a demoralising blow for the Greens.
And another thing…
It’s clear that Greens campaigners have read David Plouffe’s Audacity to Win—the inside story of the Obama campaign through the eyes of its manger. The Greens have taken a leaf out of the Obama campampaign playbook: they are positioning themselves as political outsiders just like Obama did in his primary and general election campaigns. The “same old politics” in Washington Obama frequently spoke about on the stump has been modified to the “same old, tired party politics” in Canberra. As the year unfolds, we can expect the Greens to deploy the familiar themes of hope and change in campaign media, and utilise the organising techniques used to great success by President Obama.


4 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 19, 2010 at 5:17 pm
Leigh Ewbank
Check out Charles Richardson’s latest at Crikey for more analysis on the Greens’ campaign for the Federal seat of Melbourne:
http://www.crikey.com.au/2010/02/19/melbourne-greens-in-two-pronged-poll-proposition/
February 21, 2010 at 2:42 pm
uberVU - social comments
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by TheRealEwbank: New post: ‘The Greens High Stakes Strategy in #Melbourne’ – http://bit.ly/diWZVg...
February 22, 2010 at 2:38 pm
Doug Evans
Nice piece but I while I’ve had the impression that The Greens regard this as a major opportunity I haven’t had the impression that they are presenting it as unlosable. I reckon Adam Bandt has lost too many elections to take that attitude. I agree with your correspondent’s comment on Melissa Fyfe’s piece in the Saturday Age. She hit the nail right on the head.
February 22, 2010 at 5:43 pm
Leigh Ewbank
Cheers for the comment Doug. Before I respond, I’d like to draw attention to your blog Earthsign. It can be found at the following URL: http://duggyvans.blogspot.com/
There is no doubt that The Greens have presented the 2010 election as ‘the one’. Remember that their campaign slogan is ‘make history Melbourne’ not ‘try to/almost make history Melbourne’. Regardless of whether or not the election is presented as almost unlosable, by setting expectations that they have a real chance of winning this time around, a Labor victory will strengthen incumbent Lindsay Tanner in the eyes of the electorate and exacerbate the demoralising effects of election defeat.
I agree with you that Melissa Fyfe’s (@MelFyfe) weekend column on the Victorian Greens was excellent. I found her comments about the state Greens’ leadership situation particularly interesting. How can the Victorian Greens capitalise on opportunities that arise quickly when the party is required to come to a consensus position? Surely the need for consensus explains the lack of Greens presence at the Save the Tote rally, which Mel Fyfe describes as ‘fertile ground’ for the Greens. Perhaps now is the time the Victorian Greens elect a leader and hold them to account when their judgment is deemed incorrect. There is a risk that the Greens’ leadership team will fail to forge positions quick enough to match the fast pace of an election campaign. How many opportunities will they miss before they adapt their leadership structure?
Melissa Fyfe’s piece on the Victorian Greens, ‘It’s time the Greens became real politicians,’ can be found here: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/politics/its-time-the-greens-became-real-politicians-20100220-omvr.html